Thursday, January 27, 2011

Scream to Scream, Scene by Scene: SCENE 6 of Scream 2 (0:22:14-0:25:58)

In this project I attempt to review the entire Scream trilogy scene by scene in chronological order. Heavy spoilers and gore throughout!



SCENE 6 of Scream 2
Length: 3mins 36secs
Primary Characters: Sidney Prescott, Dewey nee Deputy Dewey (David Arquette), Randy Meeks, Derek, Mickey, Hallie, Gale Weathers, Joel the Cameraman & Cotton Weary (Liev Shreiber)
Pop Culture References:
  • None


I think this scene we're about to look at is a perfect one in showing off the differences between the first and second film. I wrote in an earlier scene that Scream 2 (and, for that matter, Scream 3, but less successfully) is a much bigger enterprise than the first. The original is more intimiate, whereas the sequel is like the filmmaking team finally got enough money to amp everything up a few notches.

Take, for instance, this scene - and the one just before it, but I had too much other stuff to discuss there - where Kevin Williamson and Wes Craven somehow manage to juggle all these characters, all of whom get "a moment", and yet the movie doesn't feel crammed or fussy at all. Gene Siskel praised Scream 2 over Scream for this very reason. In many ways it's a more impressive directorial job by Craven since there's so much more going on. In this scene alone we have the introduction of old characters as well as new characters all interacting with one another, referencing the earlier film and, while they're at it, furthering the plot in multiple ways that doesn't feel clunky. It's a shame the video of their review has been taken down, I would have loved to included for you guys.


"I'm seeing someone. Nice guy, pre-med, no apparent psychotic tendencies."

Oh Sidney, isn't that what you thought about Billy Loomis, too!


"I just worry. Look, Sid, if there is some freaked out psycho trying to follow in Billy Loomis's footsteps you probably already know him. Or her. Or them."

I love this line. Or, more specifically, I love this line as spoken by Dewey. I like that he gets "him", "her" and "them" all correct!


Uh-oh!



One thing I'd never noticed before is the look on Mickey's face when Cotton Weary appears out from behind Gale and Joel. I think at this stage of filming Craven and Williamson were still very much on the Hallie/Derek/Debbie trio so I'm probably giving this moment too much worth than it warrants, but I love Mickey's smile. It's like he always can't contain himself knowing that, with the new murders as Cotton is in town, so much focus will be on him.


"You bitch!"


Ooh, bitch *nearly* went down.


"Oh Sidney, won't you share with us, please!"








"I'll share with you!"


"Did you get that on film?"


"Yes I got that on film."

Bitch went down!

Look, there's no skirting around the issue here... Hallie's "Did you get that on film?" is just not as amazing as Tatum's "BAM, bitch went down. BAM! Sid! Super-bitch!" I like that they continue that structural link to the original, although you can already sense it starting to deviate.

TATUM 4EVA!


"Hey, you need to check your conscience at the door, Sweetie. We're not here to be loved."

I hate this line of dialogue?! I hate it. I hate it so much I want to forget it exists and just end this scene right now, which is what I will do. Because it's over. No, really, that's it. See you next time!

Scream:
Intro, Scene 1 Scene 2, Scene 3, Scene 4, Scene 5, Scene 6, Scene 7, Scene 8, Scene 9, Scene 10, Scene 11, Scene 12, Scene 13, Scene 14, Scene 15, Scene 16, Scene 17, Scene 18, Scene 19, Scene 20, Scene 21, Scene 22, Scene 23, Scene 24, Scene 25, Scene 26, Scene 27, Scene 28, Scene 29, Scene 30, Scene 31 Scene 32, Scene 33, End Credits

Scream 2
Scene 1, Scene 2, Scene 3, Scene 4, Scene 5

Monday, January 24, 2011

Review: Another Year & Catfish

Another Year
Dir. Mike Leigh
Year: 2010
Aus Rating: M
Running Time: 130mins

Catfish
Dir. Ariel Schulman & Henry Joost
Year: 2010
Aus Rating: PG
Running Time: 87mins


**WARNING: This joint review of Another Year and Catfish contains MAJOR spoilers for the latter, so unless you've seen it maybe you should wait. You've had fair warning, yeah?**

Both Another Year and Catfish start in wildly different places and yet, through a series of both surprising and meandering ways end up in much the same place. Mike Leigh’s year-in the-life film may appear to be a portrait of a lovable, if excessively “British!”, Londoner couple, and Catfish may appear (appear being a very appropriate word for this quote unquote documentary) to be about a burgeoning online romance, yet by films’ end they prove to be painful and sad examinations of the lives of two desperately lonely women, both of which probably have some deep-seeded emotional illness that they decide to thrust upon the lives of others with no consideration of the immense destructive power that they wield on those around them.

Both films start at a place of happiness, betraying the emotionally frayed road bumps to follow. As Tom and Gerri in Another Year, Jim Broadbent and Ruth Sheen seem like a typical elderly couple, living out the last few years before retirement begins and the kettle goes into maximum overdrive. They occasionally indulge Gerri’s friend Mary (a bravura performance by Leigh regular Lesley Manville) who visits their humble home every so often, humourously drinks them under the table and crashes upstairs before clamouring out of bed the next morning to face a new day. Similarly in Catfish, Schulman and Joost’s camera follows Nev Schulman, a photographer with a nice life in New York City who begins a pen-pal relationship with a wildly talented, if slightly precocious-sounding, eight year old named Abby. He’s flattered she enjoys recreating his photos with paint and he soon forms a bond with Abby’s mother, Angela, and especially her older sister, Megan.


Both take an almost puzzle like mosaic approach to their respective material with pieces slotting in to place. Leigh and his editor Jon Gregory have used the time-honoured seasonal structure to their story. Beginning in spring and progressing through summer, autumn and finally winter, they ask the audience to fill in a lot of the in between – if you think there even is a lot to fill in, which I’d argue there probably isn’t judging from the 2 hours of their lives we get to witness other than more cups of tea that you can shake a stick at – as we remain with these character for only the briefest of moments to watch an important gathering. Whether that be a dinner at home, a backyard barbecue, a meet-the-parents get together or a funeral, these few events roll ever so delicately towards the breakdown of Mary, an individual so on the edge that she’s barely hanging on by a thread. It’s all very point a to point b stuff, but a less disciplined director would have felt the need to throw kooky narrative hooks and annoying non-linear structure into the mix. It’s refreshing that Another Year is so simple.

Catfish on the other hand rapidly lays facts upon “facts”, asking the audience to assemble it alongside the bewildered Nev Schulman and his on-screen filmmaking team as it happens. If the reveal of the big secret held in the film’s grip isn’t quite the Crying Game sized wowser that the trailer had promised, it still has a power all of its own that should make more than a few audience members ask serious questions of themselves and those that they think they know.

The character of Mary in Another Year is prickly and dangerous to herself, but unfortunately Leigh seems to get more satisfaction out of watching the smug, ever-so-condescending Tom and Gerri have a laugh at her expense. Broadbent and Sheen are both good, but Broadbent’s Tom, especially, seems to all but lick his lips every time he gets to send a barbed sarcastic zinger in Mary’s direction. Why is this couple attracted to associating with losers like Mary of Ken (Peter Wight)? A regular person would have cut them off long ago, and yet – to take a line from The Supremes – they keep them hanging on. Is it because they get satisfaction out of knowing their lives are so much better than theirs friends’? What with their cute London home with greenhouse and beautiful garden, their veggie garden in a community allotment and their need to have nary a bad word to say about anyone.


Mary’s defining character traits are that she devours wine like it’s the elixir of life and that she is hopelessly single, attracted to the wrong men at the wrong time. Leigh, Tom and Gerri give Mary frequent mocking glances as she descends into her regular drunken stupor, all but deploring her life choices yet giving her a soapbox to yammer on about them. Watch as Mary deludes herself and stay for the eventual “I’m a drunken mess” comeuppance. Anybody in the audience who has been long-term single will relate to Mary on some level, and many will easily recognise the furrowed brow and the mocking tone in the voices of those in relationships. When their son, Oliver Maltman’s Joe, who Mary has an inappropriate crush on, begins a relationship with Katie – a Happy-go-Lucky-ish character played by Karina Fernandez – it’s as if Mary’s single state is made out to be even more pathetic.

It’s not hard then to figure out why she all but has a mental breakdown by film’s end. The final segment of Another Year is owned by Manville – and, to a lesser extent, Martin Savage in a brief role as Tom’s angry nephew – who can’t hide just how close she is to falling off the tightrope completely. She’s clearly unstable, relying on drink to get through the crushing depression that has set over the past year. Leigh shows no sign of wanting to help Mary, instead choosing to focus his camera on her – quite literally at film’s end, the camera lingers on her sad, miserable face in a compelling final note – and point out her misgivings.

In Catfish, however, the figure of Angela is even more disturbed. As she relies on fake and embellished personas to live a life she wished she had, she comes across as deeply wounded and in desperate need to emotional help. When Imelda Staunton is asked what she wants most in the world in Another Year’s haunting prologue she replies “a different life”. If Angela was asked the same question – and she all but is asked, just a little less directly by Nev – I can’t imagine she’d reply much more differently. She is quite open once the secrets of her deviousness are laid bare (although as the credits sequence tells us, not even her confessions are elaborate fibs).


Whether Catfish is real or not was, for me at least, a complete non-issue by the end since. From its relatively humble beginnings of filming a blossoming online friendship to its conclusion of a woman who needs professional help and guidance, it had morphed into something altogether beyond “omgwhat’sthesecret?!?!” shock tactics. Unlike, for instance, Casey Affleck’s I’m Still Here, which is rendered null and void by its farcical revelations, Catfish works either way. If real it’s a fascinating documentation of a woman that utilised modern technology as a means to feed her illness; if fake then it becomes a solidly acted, well-written documentation of a woman that utilised technology as a means to feed her illness. No matter the journey, the destination is very much a thought provoking and, ultimately, frightening one. Whether the film - especially the early parts - work, or feel organic enough to work I'm less certain on.

I saw these two films on the same day and was quite surprised at how much they had in common. Of course, if Another Year gives you the sudden urge to get yourself out of the single rut that you’re in because, clearly, everyone is laughing at you, then Catfish will surely make you second guess any decision to use online dating a means of finding a partner. I can only imagine what it must be like to follow these two films with Blue Valentine, which puts a fluffy bow on the trilogy of relationship woes. Let’s call it the “Life Sucks and Then You Die” trilogy because clearly being single sucks, dating sucks and if you’re married it either sucks or you have to surround yourself with miserable sods to make yourself forget how much being married sucks.
Another Year, B-
Catfish, B

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Scream to Scream, Scene by Scene: SCENE 5 of Scream 2 (0:17:16-0:22:13)

In this project I attempt to review the entire Scream trilogy scene by scene in chronological order. Heavy spoilers and gore throughout!



SCENE 5 of Scream 2
Length: 4mins 57secs
Primary Characters: Gale Weathers, Joel the Cameraman (Duane Martin), Debbie Salt (Laurie Metcalf), Chief Hartley (Lewis Arquette), Sidney Prescott, Randy Meeks, Derek, Mickey, Hallie, Sorority Sister Lois (Rebecca Gayheart), Sorority Sister Murphy (Portia de Rossi), Portia de Rossi's Eyebrows (Themselves)
Pop Culture References:
  • Kevin Bacon ("Six degrees of Kevin Bacon" is mentioned)


Wow! Awesome crane shot! Wow! So cinematic!

Okay, seriously, let's get to that recently released Canadian trailer for Scream 4 before we get carried away with this scene. I haven't blogged about it yet because a) I've had minimal time and b) it keeps getting taken down, but "Steve" left a link in the comments of an entry so now we have one! yeehaw!


We won't talk about it too much, but needless to say I am excited. Reveals more of the characters (both in terms of number and in terms of their actual character traits and so forth) than the last teaser, which I like. My favourite bit is the "do you like scary movies?" gag that Emma Roberts and Hayden Panattiere share in the bedroom. It reminds me of this bit between Sidney and Randy where it really felt like they were a group of friends who had existed before scene 1.

Some of the scares look very good, such as the Adam Brody one at the end and Sidney's rooftop chase looks intriguing. Could she be getting chased by two Ghostface-clad killers at the same time? It's certainly something the franchise has never done before. Or, not done obviously so with two physical Ghostface beings in the same shot. Should be interesting to see. I like that they include a replication of a shot from the opening scene of Scream 2 and, hello, Kirby's (Panattiere) reciting of remakes of "groundbreaking" horror movies. Well, apart from the use of the word "groundbreaking", which just sounds silly. Nevertheless, we'll go with it, okay?

So, in the end, I like the trailer and it just made me even more excited. A new HD version has been released to the Apple website and it's the US version. There are a couple of shots that are different, but other than that it's all the same. Less than four months to go, you guys! Can we wait? No we can't, but we'll have to. Back to "Scream to Scream", okay?


Oh hai Gale! So glad to have you back and looking as bitchy as ever. She looks so feline-like; can you imagine 1997 era Courteney Cox as Catwoman? Now that would be a re-interpretation that I'd be on board for (ahem Mr Nolan!) Of the three hairstyles Gale had throughout the trilogy, this one is by far the best. As Dewey would say, "nice streaks!"


Love the look on Gale's face when her new cameraman, Joel, tells her he "almost won an award" for shooting the local bingo championships. The character of Derek is an interesting one though since he's the only black character in the entire trilogy who does not die (albeit, from a very small number of black characters - what's that about? A point so chin-stroke worthy that they put Deon Richmond on the poster for Scream 3 despite being in all of 3 minutes of the film!) We'll discuss this more later on.


Look at "Debbie Salt" hanging around there in the background. Whosoever idea it was (that'd be Lisa Beach) to cast Laurie freakin' Metcalf in a slasher horror movie deserves a medal. Yet again, one of this series' biggest assets is its ability to cast actors that we all know in unexpected parts. Not just mere cameos, but actual parts. I mean, Roseanne's sister Jackie as the killer in Scream 2 just sounds ridiculous and yet utterly amazing.


"Excuse me, Ms Weathers, could I have a minute? Just one second. I know you must get this all the time, but I just wanna say I am such a big fan of your work. I just finished your book, I couldn't put it down. Insightful, probing, I just really, really loved your book."


"Thank you, thanks."


"Sure. I'm a writer myself, I just write for the local paper. I'm Debbie Salt. I took your seminar in Chicago last year, I was the one in the front row asking all the questions."


"Right, I thought you looked familiar."


"Aw, thank you. Can't wait to see the movie! You know, you must be getting a lot of flak on that, right? What with all the violence in cinema issues. What is your position going to be?"
"No comment."



"Mr Weathers, it would be such an honour for me if I could just get a quote from you for my story."


"Okay. Begin quote."
"Great!"
"Your flattering remarks are both obvious and desperate. End quote."



(from the background) "Ouch!"

This entire bit is gold, from Gale's so-couldn't-care-less almost monotone replies of "thank you" and "Right, I thought you looked familiar", but my favourite bit is the "ouch!" from the press gallery after Gale's big line at the end. It's so sassy talk show host, I love it! Plus, knowing in retrospect that "Debbie Salt" (aka Mrs Loomis, Billy's mother) is the mastermind behind the killings makes you realise how much she must be full of rage at this moment and plotting her revenge.


That would be David Arquette's father - and Courteney Cox's future father-in-law - Lewis Arquette. It really was a family affair on set!


You remember how I said Scream 2 followed a very set structure, almost identical to the original, for the first half an hour or so? Well I guess this is Scream 2's version of the fountain scene where we get to see all of Sidney's crew in one place and suss out the likely suspects. No jokes about gutting, livers in mailboxes and Sharon Stone, unfortunately.


"Sidney, look, it's Gale Weathers. Star of the Gale Weathers press conference, based on the book by Gale Weathers, soon to be a major motion picture starring... Gale Weathers."
"Be kind, she saved our lives."


I like that Randy makes a joke about Gale having calf implants. Who has calf implants? Gale Weathers, that's who!


We already discussed the history of Sarah Michelle Gellar's Cici character and how she was originally meant to be in this scene with Rebecca Gayheart, Portia de Rossi and Portia de Rossi's eyebrows. Every time I remember this scene I remember it with Gellar purely of the image found on this page since it was, for some reason, widely used and circulated. It always confuses me because Cici is "Omega Beta Zeta" in her death scene and Gayheart/de Rossi/de Rossi's Eyebrows are not OBZ. Thinking its all one giant plot hole I then remember all the kerfuffle about her character reshuffle and then I go calm again. Although, if you look carefully in the background you can see Cici standing there in her purple top and blonde hair right where she would be saying "Starfuckers" per the original script.


But, really folks, are you read for the big entrance of Portia de Rossi's eyebrows??


"This must be flat out hell for you?!"

Amazing!


"It's really weird, isn't it? To think this fuss is all because of you! I mean, not directly, but in some 'six degrees of Kevin Bacon' way!"

EVEN MORE AMAZING OMG!!!!


Hah. That look of a stunned mullet on the faces of Derek and Mickey always continues my chuckle from Portia de Rossi's supreme comedic prowess.


*explodes*
I'm sorry, I have to give myself a minute to pull myself up off the floor from the pits of laughter that Portia de Rossi's cocked eyebrow sends me into. I fuckin' love it!

Of course, how can I get that snobby-looking uptight sorority girl to the right of frame. She's not credited so I don't know who the actress is, but my god would you look at her face. You just know she grew up to be Julie Cooper-Nichol.


"Who's that?" Derek asks... why it's Dewey, of course! Yay! We all love Deputy Dewey, don't we? DON'T WE?

Cut to a new scene and serious time. Ooh...

Scream:
Intro, Scene 1 Scene 2, Scene 3, Scene 4, Scene 5, Scene 6, Scene 7, Scene 8, Scene 9, Scene 10, Scene 11, Scene 12, Scene 13, Scene 14, Scene 15, Scene 16, Scene 17, Scene 18, Scene 19, Scene 20, Scene 21, Scene 22, Scene 23, Scene 24, Scene 25, Scene 26, Scene 27, Scene 28, Scene 29, Scene 30, Scene 31 Scene 32, Scene 33, End Credits

Scream 2
Scene 1, Scene 2, Scene 3, Scene 4

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Review: The Green Hornet

The Green Hornet
Dir. Michel Gondry
Year: 2011
Aus Rating: M
Running Time: 119mins


The Green Hornet is a movie that succeeds in spite of itself. Pitting two individuals with such distinguishable styles – co-writer/executive producer/star Seth Rogen and director Michel Gondry – together is almost always a recipe for disaster, and yet in Gondry’s outlandish, visually flash and snappy adaptation of the famous radio serials is a delightful hoot from word go. It is alive and marches to its own imaginative beat, which is something I appreciate more than others it seems.

Seth Rogen, co-writing with Evan Goldberg, stars as Britt Reid, the son of a recently deceased newspaper tycoon played by Tom Wilkinson. Along with his father’s mechanic Kato (pop star and Curse of the Golden Flower actor Jay Chou), the two form a crime-fighting duo whose mission – I think – is to pretend to be villains in order to get closer the man responsible for all the violence in Los Angeles. That’d be Christoph Waltz as the ridiculously named Chudnofsky. Cameron Diaz plays Lenore, but her role is nearly non-existence, which is a shame because Gondry has proven to quite adept at giving perky blondes wonderful roles (hello Kirsten Dunst in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind).


It’s basically all one big excuse for Rogen to wear dapper (and, for this viewer, irresistibly sexy) three-piece suits while explosions detonate around him and every second evil henchman dies by having something fall on them, whether it be a car, a bulldozer, a steamroller… The plot is more-or-less a series of exposition and bromance bonding that act as nothing more than flimsy bridges between escalating loco action sequences, but what loco action sequences they are! And that exposition? Filled with ballsy zingers recited at such rapid fire pace by (mostly) Rogen, the kind that you would expect from him and Goldberg (they also co-wrote Superbad and Pineapple Express). Scenes between Rogen and Chou have a zest that isn’t usually found in action blockbusters of this sort. The Iron Man films tried, but I much prefer Rogen’s brand of the similar playboy/frat house humour.

The action really is quite something. I don’t recall having ever been so particularly taken by a film’s stunt work – shame on me, really – but the work by the stunt crew here appears phenomenal. Sure, a lot of the fight sequences involve crotch-kicks and head slams, but Gondry has filmed the action scenes so as to allow an audience to properly see them all. That it physically looks as if a real person is having their nuts smashed by a villain is not to be underestimated. A seemingly never-ending parade of people smashing through windows, slamming into walls and doors, falling out of high places, punching, slashing and stomping mixed with an assortment of weaponry, inventive and traditional, make the escalating madcap violence hilariously numbing. Why is a man getting kicked in the testicles so much funnier here than anywhere else I’ve seen it lately? I’m not quite sure, but I appreciated the film’s bravura and the way it embraced its crazed style.

That Gondry was able to stick to Rogen and Goldberg's rhythm and still have some of his style come through is a bit of a minor miracle. Oh sure, there are no scenes made of paper mache, but compare The Green Hornet to anything by, for instance, Stephen Sommers or Rob Cohen and you can see an instant difference. Gondry is no director for hire and he has supplanted enough style to make the movie stand out without going overboard and alienating. There’s a very distinct Dick Tracy meets The Shadow circa 2011 vibe there that I clicked with. It embraces its cartoon heritage, but does so in a way that isn’t dopily obvious (hello Hulk) or frustratingly literal (that’d be you Sin City). The 3D is mostly ineffectual, although one thing Gondry makes work with the technology is split screen, which produces a nifty floating effect as his cameras follow a series of various characters during a sequence that makes TimeCode quadrant screen look quaint.

The reactions of this film have been amongst some of the most fascinating in recent memory. For every critic or two giving it a one-star savaging there is another hailing it to the heavens. They say comedy is subjective, and so too are big budget, wisecracking, visual effect extravaganza blockbusters. In a time when so many films of The Green Hornet’s ilk are trying desperately to be “gritty”, “realistic” and “mature”, played so seriously that you could cut glass with the straight angels of the pretty lead cast-member’s jaw, it’s hard to imagine myself having more fun in a movie of this kind. What Gondry’s film has, and has in spades, is a very specific dedication to pure and utter anarchy. There aren’t just times when The Green Hornet goes off the rails – it goes off the rails, rockets off into the stratosphere, loops around while juggling five missiles at once and then lands perfectly back on the tracks; it should crash and burn, but ultimately becomes something I embraced in all of its wow-pop-zing glory. A-

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Review: Burlesque

Burlesque
Dir. Steve Antin
Year: 2010
Aus Rating: M
Running Time: 120mins

There is a lyric in Burlesque’s closing number that goes “get yo ass up / show me how you Burlesque.” It’s an apt line to end the film (and, for that matter, to begin this review) since it sums up so much about Steve Antin’s flashy musical – one of the few truly original live action movie musicals of the genres new millennium rebirth – so well. Not only does it seem completely in character that this film would create a new word in the English language; burlesque as a verb - they’re, like, pulling a MacGyver! Secondly, it’s apt because it exemplifies how completely out of tune (pun intended) Burlesque is to the actual art of burlesque. Characters sure do “get their ass up” here, but it ain’t in the name of “Burlesque”. Antin’s movie has about as much in common with classic burlesque as Mickey Rooney has with Chinese culture in Breakfast at Tiffany’s. And about as much class, too!

If I believed in guilty pleasures then I would probably be willing to consider Burlesque as one, go to my corner and let everyone else debate whether it’s a “good” movie or not (mostly, not). I don’t tend to believe in guilty pleasures, however and I don’t feel one ounce of guilt from enjoying Burlesque and neither should you. I had a riotous good time watching it through its self-lubricated veneer of Vaseline and I’d hazard a guess and say that if you think you’re going to like Burlesque then you will in fact have a great time.


Many may suggest that Burlesque hasn’t much of a plot, and that the barest of plots it does have are hardly worth mentioning, but it has a one all right and Antin, who also wrote the screenplay, works that bad boy like the audience has never seen it before in their life! Opening in Small Town, Iowa where there’s a twinkle in the golden setting sun’s eye, parents name their children Timmy and diner’s close between the lunch and dinner rushes so that undiscovered talents slumming it in the sticks can perform Etta James routines using a sweeping broom as a microphone. An impossibly gorgeous woman by the name of Ali (Christina Aguilera in her screen debut) has somehow not cottoned on to the fact that reality programs live for talents like hers and has only just decided to catch the next bus out of town with a one-way ticket and go to Hollywood. You can tell she’s excited because she sleeps through her arrival; she was so excited she could nap, I suppose.

What follows are a job hunting montage that rivals Dolly Parton in Barnet Kellman’s 1992 small-town-girl-mistaken-for-radio-host romantic comedy Straight Talk for gobsmacking “are they for real” yuk yuks, Ali’s apartment being robbed like someone spliced in a scene from CSI: Los Angeles and Christina Aguilera’s face running the gamut of emotions from “confused” to “slightly confuseder”. Stirring stuff, indeed. Before long she has stumbled across The Burlesque Lounge, a dingy-looking club that’s nestled amongst developing skyscrapers, it’s entrance seemingly tucked away up a fire escape. The only hint this club even exists is the illuminated sign out the front that looks as if it would blow over with a stiff breeze. Oh, let’s not forget the PG scantily-clad woman out the front whose job appears to be to give lusty eyes to anyone that walks by while repeatedly rolling her stockings up and down for no reason. Aguilera’s eyes light up so big she appears to be considering a change of sexuality.

Before long Ali is working in the club as a waitress, serving the drinks that Jack (a bubbly Cam Gigandet) hands her. Audiences watching Burlesque know she’s made for stardom because she can memorise patrons’ order like song lyrics and swings a waiter’s tray like a microphone prop. She’s like Nomi Malone with her ability to know dance routines before they’ve even been taught to her! Except this time Ali is talented whereas Nomi was just a freak with devilish nails. That Ali is talented is, much like most of everything else in the film, not a surprise – casting an unknown might have at least given us some suspense as to how talented, but that’s a minor glitch – although the film has a fun time getting there. Upon entering the club on her first night, Ali watches an elderly woman with frightening-yet-hypnotising cheekbones (imagine Burlesque in 3D if you dare!) perform a song called “Welcome to Burlesque”, surrounded by a parade women who dress like skaters who turn tricks. The camera does anything it can to hide the zombie-like trance Cher’s face has found itself in, including filming through martini glasses, reflections on drum kits and smudgy windows. That Ali doesn’t even flinch at the lyric “It’s not the end of days / it’s just the bump and grind”, while an odd Alan Cumming growls at her from the entrance booth, proves she will have no troubles fitting in.


Of course, Ali’s pipes prove a winning combination for the club, which is going under for the sake of the plot. Perhaps if this mystical Burlesque showwoman – Cher as bi-polar Cher, I mean Tess – didn’t spend so much on hiring a cavalcade of dancers who somehow earn enough to afford speedy sports cars and eat takeaway pizza every night – surely the best paid dancers in LA - then the dance hall wouldn’t be so bankrupt. Alas the plot requires some threadbare tether so we go with it. The crowds start rolling in, as does the offer from a wealthy businessman (Eric Dane as Eric Dane’s Character from Grey’s) to be his wanton sex goddess and maybe also… A STAR.

Yes, it’s all ridiculous and cliché and so are the reactions of people who are at all surprised that a movie titled Burlesque starring Cher and Christina Aguilera is ridiculous and cliché. That’s part of its charm. But comfort food alone isn’t enough and Antin manages to come through with the goods in other areas.

On a technical level there really isn’t much to find fault with unless you’re in a prickly mood. Michael Kaplan’s costume design is especially praise-worthy with its vast array of performance outfits – Cher’s circus ringmaster ensemble, Aguilera’s hands-on-breasts dress and the getup made entirely out of strategically placed pearls are all perfect (again, maybe having your Burlesque performers wear dresses made entirely out of pearls is bad for the bank balance, Cher!) Production designer Jon Gary Steele has fun with the space, pretending the interior of the Burlesque Lounge is a mammoth hall with removable walls, revolving bars and cascading staircases that appear as if from nowhere like out of a Lloyd Bacon movie. I almost expected an adjoining ballroom to emerge just for the sake of it. Sound design, too, is key, especially during “Express”, which all but disintegrates the cinema sound system with its barrage of handclaps, finger snaps and booty slaps.


Aguilera has never been much of a dancer with her best music videos generally being those that focus on a killer imagery hook (“Fighter”, “Dirrty” and “Hurt”.) Here she acts adequately, sings impressively and squeezes out a commendable amount of comic timing. Performances of “I Am a Good Girl” and “A Guy What Takes His Time” (including large rectangular light box in front of her woman parts ala Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery, naturally) are far more impressive due to Aguilera’s array of kooky facial expressions and exaggerated diva-DIVA flourishes. The very final shot before the credits role is, perhaps, one of the biggest laughs of the film.

Cher is Cher. Whether she’s lurching around on a stage performing Diane Warren torch ballads (“You Haven’t Seen the Last of Me”, which is fabulous, by the way) or hurling howler dialogue (“how many times did I hold your hair back while you were over the toilet, throwing up everything but your memories?”) at us with the seriousness of a dead puppy, she’s like a divine entity beamed down to Earth to make us all feel moderately less okay for not being as incredible as she. Cam Gigandet comes out of Burlesque smelling like roses, giving the film’s best performance by far. He shows triple the amount of personality than he’s previously been allowed and his strip scene is entertaining not just for his display of skin, but for the charm he brings to it. And in what amounts of a mini reunion of The OC, Peter Gallagher also wanders around the set every now whenever the plot requires it. It’s enough to make me wish Seth and Ryan took a trip up the highway to LA one night and ran into Volchok and Sandy Cohen hanging around a sleazy dance bar wearing mascara and screaming at alien women from Mars. Bless.

Stanley Tucci, meanwhile, acts as if his Nigel from The Devil Wears Prada had taken one too many attacks from Miranda Priestly, moved down to Los Angeles and became the prerequisite gay director of a slightly-risqué dance club. His character gets a surprisingly sweet gay hook-up sequence that I really can’t imagine anywhere else but here… or in a film by Todd Stephens. Kristen Bell pops up occasionally, too, whenever the plot demands someone to scoff and scowl. And then Diana Agron of Glee appears momentary in a role so brief I can’t believe Andre Braugher wasn’t cast.


If Burlesque has any surprises up its sleeve – and I maintain it has several – it’s biggest is that Steven Antin somehow managed to insert a plot about, of all things, air rights. If you’ve ever wanted a movie in which Cher fiercely battles big business by blackmailing development tycoons to purchase air then Burlesque is as close as you’re gonna get. Bob Fosse and Rob Marshall, eat your hearts out!

Simply, Burlesque is the sort of movie in which a black dancer is named Coco Puff and another actually says “go cuckoo for Coco Puffs!” It is a movie in which Cher all but gives her gaggle of real life impersonators a step-by-step guide to applying make-up to look just like her! It is a movie where Christina Aguilera calls Kristen Bell a drag queen without a hint of irony. It is a movie where Cher’s character consoles a dancer who lost her contact lenses by spouting “if you fall off the stage – legs extended, boobs out!” and in which musical sequences defy space, time and logic. I’m so glad it is. Post-screening I spent hours changing my mind as to what my favourite scene was; Burlesques is the gift that keeps on giving!

Being a musical though the most important aspect is, indeed, the music and I was so pleased to discover the music here is top notch. Aguilera’s concerts have always been dotted with old school classics, notably by Etta James, and here she gets to belt out a couple, too. The real jackpot is, surprisingly, in the original material. “I Am a Good Girl” has a delicious camp purr, “Bound To You” is a big diva ballad co-written by Sia and “You Haven’t Seen the Last of Me” is already an earnest classic, a song so good that Cher could simply sing it 28 times in a row and still make her seventeenth comeback concert a success. That the soundtrack’s producer somehow shoehorns in an Aguilera-led remake of Marilyn Manson’s “The Beautiful People” says something, but I’m not quite sure what.


Even having enjoyed 95% of the movie, and the songs in it, still wasn’t enough to prepare for the very 100 per cent rousing showstopper climax. By the time Aguilera sing’s “get yo ass up / show me how you burlesque” in “Show Me How You Burlesque” the film has steered so far away from its already meagre proximity to actual burlesque that there’s no sense in noting it. This film-ending sequence, however, is the film’s standout and proves Antin may actually know what he’s doing behind the camera after all. It’s big, bold and flashy and Antin catches it all. Fancy that, actually being about to see dancers dance in a musical! The song is punchy and the design of the sequence features enough bulbs to light a small town, surrounding dancer upon dancer upon dancer. They just keep popping up out of nowhere! Occupational Health and Safety regulations were surely breached with that trick. How long did they have to wait under those tables? It’s apt that Burlesque goes out in a blaze of excessive, toe-tapping glory. It will put a spring in your step, if you’re so inclined, and, personally, I felt like I was a high for hours after. I instantly burst into a standing ovation with applause.

I enjoyed Burlesque more than any other movie I’ve seen in a long time. I almost wished I had a remote so I could rewind scenes right there in the cinema and as the credits started to roll I wanted the film to start right back on up again. I would have stayed for as long as they were willing to allow me. Guilty pleasure? Nah! I can only dream of more movies having this one’s moxy. Can’t get past the cliché of the pregnant dancer or the dialogue that reads like anti-poetry – “who wrote that?” “I did.” “You wrote that?” – then don’t bother, but as Burlesque tucked into a lip-synced musical sequence of Marilyn Monroe’s “Diamonds are a Girls Best Friend” I couldn’t help but wonder if those reacting against the tireless parade of camp on display would feel the same way about Gentlemen Prefer Blondes in 2010. It has a musical sequence set inside a gay nudist gym, after all. !!!+